The George W. Bush Guide to Secret Government
Here's an article that pretty much says what I'm thinking. So I won't type down what I'm thinking and instead get right to the article.
Scott C. Smith of Counterbias.org writes:
The entire article is here:
The George W. Bush Guide to Secret Government
Scott C. Smith of Counterbias.org writes:
You know, I get the impression that George W. Bush really doesn't understand the concept of checks and balances as it relates to government. I think he really believes his government is an autocracy, and has used the attacks of 9/11 to justify an alarming abuse of power by the executive branch. Bush believes that, since we are at war, the Constitution essentially grants him unlimited power to protect America. But we're not at war -- Congress hasn't declared war -- and what we're supposedly at war with is a noun. Terrorism. Ostensibly to prevent another 9/11 attack from happening. However, the Bush administration does not strike me as a bunch of people with their act together, and they are power-mad. Secret military courts, holding suspects indefinitely without benefit of counsel, suspending the Fourth Amendment in the hunt for Al-Qaeda terrorists -- all this and more to present the illusion of safety, the illusion of security.And one more snippet...
Despite all of our efforts, Osama Bin Laden remains at large, and the Bush administration would rather just put their collective heads in the sand and pretend the man doesn't exist anymore. For all we know, he is regrouping with his operatives in planning another attack. And what we do know about Al-Qaeda is that they are patient, willing to wait years before carrying out an attack, and the 9/11 Commission recently gave the Bush administration poor marks in homeland security preparedness. The report, issued on Dec. 5, 2005, gave the administration "more F's than A's," 41 grades in all to measure the progress of the Administration in implementing security proposals by the 9/11 Commission.
Bush claims his authority as President of the United States gives him the legal and constitutional authority, because, well, darn it, we're at war with a noun, and if we have to shove the Fourth Amendment aside in the hopes that someone in the United States is sending IMs to Osama Bin Laden and we catch them, isn't that a good thing?
Not so much, according to the Congressional Research Service, which issued a report on Jan. 6, concluding that the Bush administration's justification for wiretapping without a warrant conflicts with existing law and hinges on weak legal arguments.
No big surprise there, eh?
The report stated that Bush probably could not claim the broad presidential powers he did after 9/11, as Congress had not expressly intended those powers. The Congress authorized Bush the use of military force to combat terrorism after 9/11.
"It appears unlikely that a court would hold that Congress has expressly or impliedly authorized the NSA electronic surveillance operations here," the authors of the CRS report wrote, also concluding that the Bush administration's legal justification for the wiretaps "does not seem to be . . . well-grounded (in law)."
I have my doubts that any report concluding that what the Bush administration's wiretapping program was illegal would result in any change in the program. Bush will do what he wants, for as long as he wants, while there is a Republican majority in Congress, not to mention right-wing cheerleaders like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, whom I suspect would find a way to defend Bush if the man was secretly volunteering time at Planned Parenthood or scamming tribal casinos of millions of dollars. There seems to be only a handful of Republicans who have openly criticized Bush and his administration's programs. Benjamin Franklin quite possibly had predicted the state of U.S. politics, circa 2006, when he said, "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." And thanks to the sheep of the "red" states, which blindly support Bush as if he were royalty, our government is moving slowly but surely down that path. Welcome to the Bush autocracy. Ironic how weÂre working so hard on establishing a democracy in the Middle East when we cannot seem to get it right here in the United States.
The entire article is here:
The George W. Bush Guide to Secret Government
3 Comments:
Excellent find there, Adam. That does pretty much sum it up.
Yeah, that's a good one. Can't think of anything to add to it.
Thanks guys. I'm suprised I found it too. I enjoy digging for these type of articles.
Post a Comment
<< Home